1A – Iowa State University

SLF Calls on Iowa State to Revise Tabling Policy

About the Case

Southeastern Legal Foundation (SLF) sent a letter to Iowa State University demanding that it revise its unconstitutional tabling policy. Tabling is one of the most popular forms of expression on college campuses, where students set up a display, hand out flyers, and invite other students to discuss current events and join their organization. But in an effort to shut down that form of speech, Iowa State limits student organizations to just eight tabling reservations a semester. This policy effectively penalizes active student organizations who want to engage in expression.

Read More

In its letter challenging the policy, SLF explains that it is unreasonable to place limits on how often students can engage in a particular form of speech on campus. Students rely on tabling as an effective and approachable way to convey their message on campus. By limiting how often students can table, and therefore limiting how students get their messages across, Iowa State engages in a form of censorship called prior restraint. As such, SLF demands that Iowa State revise its policy to remove the tabling limits.

Case Status

Pre-Litigation

Court

Why This Matters

Students across the country rely on tabling as a way to convey their message. Tabling allows students to engage in several forms of speech at once: they can erect a display, hand out flyers, and invite students to speak to them simultaneously. Moreover, tabling is often a safer means of conveying a message because it invites students to approach speakers instead of the other way around. But at Iowa State University, students are limited to only eight tabling reservations a semester.

SLF General Counsel Kimberly Hermann states:

“If students are eager to convey their message at the beginning of the semester and use up all their reservations, they are out of luck. Iowa State won’t let them continue tabling if they’ve reached their limit. This is an unreasonable, unconstitutional prior restraint on speech.”

Director of SLF’s 1A Project Cece O’Leary explains:

“Colleges and universities cannot place limits on how often students can speak. When they do so, it is a form of censorship because they penalize the more proactive student organizations who want to engage in speech activities. It is unconstitutional to favor silence over speech.”

Why This Matters

Students across the country rely on tabling as a way to convey their message. Tabling allows students to engage in several forms of speech at once: they can erect a display, hand out flyers, and invite students to speak to them simultaneously. Moreover, tabling is often a safer means of conveying a message because it invites students to approach speakers instead of the other way around. But at Iowa State University, students are limited to only eight tabling reservations a semester.

SLF General Counsel Kimberly Hermann states:

“If students are eager to convey their message at the beginning of the semester and use up all their reservations, they are out of luck. Iowa State won’t let them continue tabling if they’ve reached their limit. This is an unreasonable, unconstitutional prior restraint on speech.”

Director of SLF’s 1A Project Cece O’Leary explains:

“Colleges and universities cannot place limits on how often students can speak. When they do so, it is a form of censorship because they penalize the more proactive student organizations who want to engage in speech activities. It is unconstitutional to favor silence over speech.”

News Releases

Share This