As part of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 signed by President Biden, Congress created a farm loan forgiveness program for non-white farmers. Under the program, the U.S. Department of Agriculture automatically forgave federal farm loans at 120 percent of the loan value unless the farmer is white. The federal government’s exclusion of white farmers is illegal and unconstitutional. That is why SLF and Mountain State Legal Foundation (MSLF) filed a lawsuit in federal court on behalf of Rob Holman, a fourth-generation Tennessee farmer who is excluded from the program solely because of his skin color.
The federal court swiftly issued a preliminary injunction pausing the loan forgiveness program. Just one year later, Congress repealed the unconstitutional program. Mr. Holman is now seeking attorney’s fees but the lower courts are refusing to give them, claiming that the federal government’s actions were justifiable. He is now appealing his case to the United States Supreme Court.
Read More
Mr. Holman’s lawsuit challenges the provision in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 that provides automatic loan forgiveness of up to 120 percent of the loan amount for farmers and ranchers, unless they are white. It also challenges the unconstitutional program’s exclusion of white farmers from re-applying for government-backed loans, making the Biden Administration’s “relief” package doubly unconstitutional.
SLF and MSLF filed the lawsuit in the Western District of Tennessee on behalf of Robert Holman, a fourth-generation Tennessee farmer. Rob is a husband and a father of a young daughter. He farms with his father in Union City, Tennessee, where they have 2,200 combined acres to grow crops, mostly corn, and soybeans. Rob’s family’s primary income comes from farming.
To help farmers and ranchers weather the pandemic, Congress decided that it was going to forgive federal farm loans – erasing the full amount of the loan and sending the forgiven debtor 20 percent of the loan’s value in cash to cover any resulting income tax liability.
But unlike other farmers and ranchers, Rob does not qualify for federal farm loan forgiveness because of the color of his skin.
Discriminating on the basis of race is illegal and unconstitutional. The federal government cannot grant specific benefits based solely on race, regardless of policy motivations. This is especially true here where Congress stated that the goal of the $4 billion challenged race-based loan forgiveness had nothing to do with financial strain caused by Covid-19 pandemic, but instead was enacted to end “systemic racism.”
The U.S. Supreme Court has declared that the way to stop race-based discrimination is to stop discriminating on the basis of race. The federal government’s use of government-sponsored race discrimination as a tool to end “systemic racism” is patently unconstitutional. Both the federal court and Congress recognized this and stopped the program. Mr. Holman is entitled to attorney’s fees because he succeeded in stopping the program, so he is turning to the Supreme Court to request those fees.